The Afterlife of Sir Christopher Wren

ox

Today I engaged in the most businessy business of my English sojourn by presenting a paper at a conference, sponsored by the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain at St. John’s College, Oxford, on Wren’s later life/influence/rejection following his death.   My paper considered what I called Wren’s inexorable influence: he was too big, too famous, too extraordinary to ignore, and yet too problematic ( for 19th- century Americans, at least) to embrace whole-heartedly.  My architect, Walter, found his way around Wren by focusing on the rational and ” scientific” aspects of his practice (especially the dome of St. Paul’s), and he wasn’t alone.  Wren was alternately revered, reviled, totemized and trumped as a model of aesthetics, science, practice, at home and abroad.  In addition to this fine consideration of a great architect, the symposium made me wonder more generally on the nature of fame.  Are there other architects of Wren’s long- lasting, yet changing status?  Are their stories similarly tied to themes of colonialism and empire?  Does that key into the way their appreciation alters through time?  And to what extent, if any, do monumental people rise above, or fall below, the fame of the monuments that they leave behind?   I wonder.

Advertisements
Tagged , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: